I think they shoulda just focused on the gaming side of everything first, then branched out after they figured that out. Let alone do that and then be successful in 2-3 other different industries. No doubt in my mind that GALA will be a $10 token by the time the market matures.Įhhh, i guess we will just have to agree to disagree :/ I just think they are in wayyy over their heads, I mean it would be quite the accomplishment if in a few years gala ecosystem could be comparable to something like steam. Now, idk the numbers here, but I reckon there will be a time (if it's not already so) that Gala recovers more GALA every day than it distributes, through NFT and node sales. The distribution halves every year, and for some time now Gala has only accepted GALA for nodes and NFTs, which was designed to create scarcity. They're not just continuing to dump GALA on the market with impunity. Friend, I think 'hyperinflation' is a bit rash. Hundreds of devs and professionals being hired. Gala is reinvesting millions in development. I see the partnerships and I think that theres no way these huge companies and successful artists, all who have armies of managers and lawyers and executives, would go all in with a company that is just shilling empty promises. Gala is planning an industrywide takeover of not just gaming but ALL entertainment media. I think people have lost sight of how new Gala was as a company when we bought our nodes. I hear you, and I understand your concerns. I wish they would just focus on the things people were hyped about in the beginning with their initial ideas, rather than constantly making new proposals and promises without even having finished the ones before them. Their issue is they just keep adding more and more and more promises and ideas, without even being done with their very first ideas. Someone who has been watching gala games for 2 years, and im sure anyone who has been following long term, is probably extremely disappointed in what they have accomplished as far as actual progression on their promises. I do blame gala for moving at a snails pace on their promises and early ideas… not taking steps to try and reduce the severity of the hyper inflation of their main token… no updated tokenomics… 1 game released TO DATE, the same game that was released 2 years ago when I had bought a node. I dont blame gala for the nft prices dropping, thats more due to the overall loss in momentum and overall trend reversal across the whole NFT market. But gala just doesnt give a fuck abt those who buy their things… because… after all… none of it is an “investment” right? literally doesnt allow talk of ROI, or anything of the sort on their discord. I mean… I have a founders aswell that I got before gala blew up. Very little amounts of activity other than absurdly highly priced Nft / node releases. Nft release after Nft release after Nft release after Nft release after Nft release. Its more of people blaming gala for not caring or not doing things for “token holders” or for the people who gave them a large portion of their initial funding ( “people who purchased Founder nodes” ) and built them up. I dont think people directly put all blame on gala for their nft value loss. Grab your bag of 50000 and when they have roughly 35000000 (1/2 of Zynga), active users ask me about tokenomics again. There is not a whole bunch of coins that can go around in the gaming world, especially if you produce a #1 game. If GALA can match Zyngas active users (They Just need 1 mind blowing game, Ex: World of Warcraft has 120 million users), each player just needs to hold 500 coins to absorb todays entire supply. Now lets put this in perspective again using Zynga as an example because GALA is in its infancy.

ECO system requires you to hold GALA, pay for NFTs and it's building it's own blockchain and gas fees will be added to the tokenomics in the future I assume you have not as you keep asking for tokenomics. You're looking for use cases and the likes of such and I assumed you did some research and played a game or 2.

Gala games review